JJ and his Misguided Quest for Justice - Arthur K

If Rawlings and Kufuor won't meet occasionally to eat “fufu na abenkwan” or “yoke gari”, let them live their separate lives.         By Arthur Kobina Kennedy Last week, former President Rawlings rejected, once again, efforts to reconcile him to his successor, President Kufuor. Speaking after attending the 60th birthday celebration of the Asantehene, Otumfour Osei Tutu II, the former President said “You cannot have Peace without Justice.” The former President was speaking in an interview he granted to Joy FM. Expanding further on his views, the former President said “I am a strong believer of Justice; in the power of virtue, okay and I am afraid if people are going to practice vice, and you expect me to feel comfortable with them, I will have difficulty with that and so with my wife.” These remarks leave the unfortunate impression that President Rawlings is virtuous while President Kufuor is not. That is unfortunate and unfair to President Kufuor. It also leaves the impression that President Rawlings is pursuing Justice while others are either obstructing him or running away from Justice. I shall return to Justice presently but let us begin with reconciliation between Presidents Rawlings and Kufuor. While I commend the Asantehene and others like him for their efforts towards reconciling the two former Presidents, I think too much effort is being expended on that issue. In truth, Ghana will do just fine with the two former Presidents living their separate lives. The fact that Rawlings and Kufuor will not meet occasionally to eat “fufu na abenkwan” or “yoke gari” washed down with palm-wine or ogogro and discuss the affairs of the nation while doing so will not matter one bit. In the early days of the American republic, John Adams and Thomas Jefferson, who followed him into the Presidency, were bitter enemies and yet the Republic grew from strength to strength. In the early days of Israel, Ben Gurion and Menachem Begin, who both served as Prime Ministers, were bitter enemies and yet, Israel did just fine. In South Africa, Mandela and de Klerk were not friends but South Africa made the transition from Apartheid to democracy just fine. The efforts expended towards reconciling the two former Presidents will better be spent reconciling ethnic groups and faiths. Justice is obviously a very important issue in a democracy and former President Rawlings’ desire for it should be given serious attention. Since he burst onto the nation’s political scene three decades ago, Mr. Rawlings has been closely linked to Justice --- or Injustice, depending on one’s point of view. Justice is important for a number of reasons. It is central to any democracy. Our nation’s motto is “Freedom and Justice.” Our constitution guarantees Justice for all Ghanaians regardless of our political or religious believes. Unfortunately for Justice, President Rawlings has significant credibility issues as an advocate for Justice. In 1992, facing the possibility of losing power, President Rawlings inserted protections for himself and his PNDC accomplices into the constitution. Forced to choose between Justice for the PNDC operatives and peace for Ghana, Ghanaians decided to choose peace and move on. The question is, If Mr. Rawlings believes in justice so passionately, why did he shield himself from justice? The bible teaches us to pray “Forgive us our trespasses as we forgive those that trespass against us.” We cannot insist on forgiveness for ourselves even as we pursue Justice for others. As every lawyer knows, he who pursues equity must come with clean hands. Therefore, today let the call go forth to President Rawlings that if he is committed to justice, he must renounce the protections contained in the 1992 Constitution. If he cannot do so, then he must forever hold his peace. If he does, then I suggest that since the 1979 coup punished coup-makers and corruption, we start from 31st December, 1981 in our quest for Justice. Here is my list of significant issues around which we can pursue Justice, for victims, perpetrators and the country: The Abuses of the Curfew imposed after the 1981 coup The 1982 murder of the 3 judges and the retired army officer The divestiture of public Corporations and whether some benefited unfairly at the nation’s expense The 1994-95 Guinea Fowl war that left 2000 dead and over 100 thousand refugees in the Northern region, together with the Dagbon crisis that left about 50 dead The disturbances in the north after the 2004 elections in the North and the deaths of Mobila and the Kumbungu three who were beheaded. The M and J as well as SCANCEM bribery allegations The 1995 “Kumi Preko” demonstrations The murder of the 18 women in Greater Accra between 1998 and 2000. The Operations of the GNPC since 1993. The violence in the 2008 elections After we agree on a list, we must agree on who can be trusted by all sides to administer the Justice. If Mr. Rawlings did not believe the process that led to the conviction of Tsatsu Tsikata was fair, why would he expect others to accept that the current process that may lead to the conviction of some NPP luminaries is fair? If we can solve these problems, I say, let Justice flow so that Mr. Rawlings will get his day, in court or on the gallows. Of course, while we spend all our limited energies on cycles of revenge and vilification, our nation’s business will remain undone. Our youth will continue to fight over toilets instead of technology. Our streets will continue to pile up with garbage. There will be death on our highways. Our healthcare system will continue to fail us. Corruption will continue to bedevil us. But we need not go down that path—the path of Rawlings. We can look to the great moments of reconciliation in history and follow their example. On March 4th, 1865, after four years of a war that had set brother against brother, caused many deaths and bitterly divided America, President Lincoln sought to reconcile his nation in an inaugural address that has become a classic in reconciliation. Declared Mr. Lincoln, in a speech that immortalized him more than his assassination a few days later; “With malice toward none, with charity for all, with firmness in the right as God gives us to see the right, let us strive on to finish the work we are in, to bind up the nation’s wounds, to care for him who shall have borne the battle and for his widow and his orphan, to do all which may achieve and cherish a just and peace amongst ourselves and with all nations.” Nearly a hundred and thirty years later, Lincoln was echoed most powerfully by a man whose generosity challenges all the petty seekers of revenge to do better. Nelson Mandela had been in prison for nearly three decades. But on April 4th, 1994, in a spirit that would gladden the heart of Jesus, Mr. Mandela breathed life into South Africa in an inaugural address that moved the souls of all mankind. Said Mr. Mandela simply “The time for the healing of the wounds has come. The moment to bridge the chasms that divide us has come. The time to build is upon us.” That is the spirit of nation-builders that we must emulate. Is Mr. Rawlings more virtuous than Mandela? Has he been wronged more than Mr. Mandela? If Mr. Mandela could forgive the actual crimes against him, his people and mankind, why can’t Mr. Rawlings forgive his imagined slights? My fellow Ghanaians, let us listen to the voices of Lincoln and Mandela, not Rawlings. Let us build our nation, together, in Justice and in peace. Let us emplace institutions that will ensure justice for our people moving forward. A justice that will prevent human rights abuses. A justice that will create jobs. A justice that will improve our health. A justice that will ensure good governance. A justice that will build peace amongst all our people, regardless of ethnicity, party or faith. That is the justice we must pursue vigorously. Let us move forward, together. Written by Arthur Kobina Kennedy Email: arkoke@aol.com